When Should College Presidents Speak out on Public Issues?
Connection Examines the President’s Bully Pulpit
BOSTON—New England’s college presidents strike a delicate balance as
they attempt to weigh in on major issues without alienating big
financial donors or other campus constituencies, according to the Fall
2004 issue of Connection: The Journal of the New England Board of Higher Education.
The Fall issue of Connection features hard-hitting articles
by New England college presidents and others about the college
presidency with a particular focus on the college president as a public
leader.
Authors include presidents Margaret McKenna of Lesley University,
Richard Pattenaude of the University of Southern Maine, Robert
Carothers of the University of Rhode Island, and Elizabeth Coleman of
Bennington.
“One of the great unheralded advantages of New England’s
concentration of colleges and universities is the potential public
leadership of its 270 or so college presidents,” writes Connection
Executive Editor John O. Harney. “The challenge they face is not that
there are so many risks to speaking out, but rather, that there’s so
much to speak out about.”
Connection is the journal of the nonprofit New England Board of Higher Education—and America’s only regional journal on higher education and the economy.
Among articles in the Fall 2004 Connection:
Balance Wheel • College presidents possess powerful
bully pulpits—but how they use those perches trips alarm bells in and
out of higher education. Stephen J. Nelson, a Brown University expert on the college presidency and author of the book, Leaders in the Crucible: The Moral Voice of College Presidents, urges presidents to use their moral authority to shield their campuses from becoming ideological battlegrounds.
Profiles in Caution • “It’s one thing to speak out on ‘safe’
topics like proposed changes to the federal Higher Education Act and
the attendant dangers of government intrusions into the academic
sphere,” observes Lesley University President Margaret A. McKenna. “But
what voice should we give to the abridgement of individual civil
liberties under the USA Patriot Act? What about gay marriage, abortion,
Enron, tax policy and health reform?” McKenna answers with two
compelling questions: “If college presidents don’t ask questions about
war and civil liberties, who will?”
It’s Not About Me • University of Southern Maine President Richard Pattenaude
argues that public university presidents owe it to their institutions
not to let too much controversy sap energy, create resistance to
change, or generate hostile opposition. “The presidency is not about
me, my opinions and my view of the new world order,” he writes. “I
consider it inappropriate to think I might somehow represent the
political views of all the people who work and learn on our campus.”
Declaring Independence • University of Rhode Island President Robert L. Carothers
offers a new model for public college and university presidents. Writes
Carothers: “Today’s leaders in higher education will have to abandon,
however grudgingly, the defense of financial entitlement and instead
shift their focus on gaining the financial and management independence
required to maintain the viability of their institutions.”
Connecting Thought and Action •
Bennington College President Elizabeth Coleman describes a key
challenge facing liberal arts colleges and their leaders: to
accommodate a reciprocal relationship between thinking and doing.
“Achieving a continuum between thought and action has never been
easy—on the academic side is the fear of diluting intellectual rigor
matched on the practical side by the fear of paralysis,” she writes.
“If anything, the increasing specialization and narrowing of academic
disciplines over the past decades has deepened the divide. … Academic
rigor is increasingly reduced to technical competence, narrowness of
focus and perpetuation of the status quo, while action is equated with
mindless activity.”
Why New Presidents Can’t Sleep • The fierce pressures
on new college presidents begin before the new leaders even arrive on
campus. Massachusetts higher education consultants James E. Samels and
James Martin explain why many new campus chiefs are leaving the job
earlier than their predecessors.
World Class • The nearly 45,000 foreign students attending
New England colleges and universities contribute $1.2 billion to the
region’s economy each year in tuition payments, living expenses and
discretionary spending. But New England’s historical leadership in
attracting foreign talent faces serious new threats ranging from
post-9/11 visa restrictions to stepped-up global competition for
students. John F. Ebersole, associate provost and dean of extended
education at Boston University, explains how New England could keep its
edge.
Old and Cold? • That’s how outsiders view New England,
according to the results of four national surveys conducted by the
University of Connecticut’s Center for Survey Research and Analysis.Douglas G. Fisher
, director of Economic & Business Development at Northeast
Utilities, explains how a group of business leaders are using the
findings to heat up the region’s image.
Advice for Regionalists • Charles H.W. Foster shares more than 50
years of regional experience with a primer on making regional
institutions work.
Excerpts • Boston College higher education scholar Philip G. Altbach warns in the quarterly International Higher Education
that universities can no longer attract the “best and the brightest”
due to deteriorating working conditions in academia. The National
Retail Federation publicizes the back-to-school buying habits of U.S.
college students and their parents.
Books • Tufts University Admissions Director Lee Coffin reviews Leveling the Playing Field: Justice, Politics and College Admissions. Freelance writer Alan R. Earls reviews A Century of Honesty, Energy, Economy, System: Wentworth Institute of Technology, 1904-2004.
|