<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>New England Board of Higher Education &#187; productivity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nebhe.org/tag/productivity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nebhe.org</link>
	<description>NEBHE</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2013 02:48:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>DC Shuttle: STEM&#8217;ing Immigration; Measuring Higher Ed Productivity; Funding Upward Bound</title>
		<link>http://www.nebhe.org/newslink/dc-shuttle-steming-immigration-measuring-higher-ed-productivity-funding-upward-bound/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=dc-shuttle-steming-immigration-measuring-higher-ed-productivity-funding-upward-bound</link>
		<comments>http://www.nebhe.org/newslink/dc-shuttle-steming-immigration-measuring-higher-ed-productivity-funding-upward-bound/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 14:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John O. Harney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Demography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newslink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newslink Topic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newslink Type]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Students]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC Shuttle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New England Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[productivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Upward Bound]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nebhe.org/?post_type=newslink&#038;p=13383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Senators Chris Coons (D-DE) and Lamar Alexander (R-TN) introduced legislation Wednesday to create a new category of student  visas for those studying in the science, technology, engineering and  math (STEM) fields. The bill would create a new category of  non-immigrant visa for foreign students pursuing a master's degree or doctorate in the ...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="pf-content"><p>Senators Chris Coons (D-DE) and Lamar Alexander (R-TN) introduced <a href="http://www.nebhe.org/wp-content/uploads/2012-05-16-SMARTJobs-Act1.pdf">legislation</a> Wednesday to create a new category of student  visas for those studying in the science, technology, engineering and  math (STEM) fields. The <a href="http://www.nebhe.org/wp-content/uploads/2012-05-16-SMARTJobs-Summary.pdf">bill</a> would create a new category of  non-immigrant visa for foreign students pursuing a master's degree or doctorate in the STEM fields in the U.S. Those students would have one year  after graduation in which to find a job and apply for permanent  resident status, and would not be subject to per-country green card  limits and certain other restrictions. Currently, all foreign students  must secure a work permit before applying for a green card if they wish  to remain and work in the U.S. after graduation. Then, in order to keep  that visa, they must remain with their original employer and at the same  job title. The number of green cards available under the  Coons-Alexander proposal is not capped, leaving open the possibility  that it could create thousands of new green cards. In contrast, a bill <a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:S.3185:" target="_blank"> (S. 3185)</a> introduced Tuesday by Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) would  eliminate 55,000 green cards given by lottery every year and award them  to STEM graduates instead.</p>
<p>An expert panel  convened by the U.S. National Research Council (NRC) released a <a href="http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=13417" target="_blank">report</a> Thursday on the difficulties presented in trying to develop a  standardized productivity measurement for colleges. The 15-member panel—composed of university administrators, economists and higher education  experts—was convened by the NRC and funded by the Lumina Foundation.  The report summary cited "accounting for input differences, wide quality  variation of outputs, and opaque or regulated pricing" among the  difficulties particular to the effort to measure and compare  productivity among colleges. The panel did propose a way forward, but  with the caveat that anything based on existing data would be a rough  estimate at best. Instead, it suggested that colleges improve data  collection in such areas as instruction hours, fields of study and job  placement rates. By including instruction hours alongside graduation  rates, the NRC panel hopes to offset concerns from institutions with  large number of part-time students, as well as an incentive to lower  graduation standards simply to increase graduation rate statistics. Even  this model, however, is intended to be used to look at the higher  education sector as a whole or at very large groups of colleges, rather  than to compare individual institutions against each other.</p>
<p>On May 11, the  U.S. Education Department announced $254 million in funding for 780 <a href="http://www.ed.gov/news/press-releases/education-department-announces-254-million-upward-bound-projects-help-about-6000" target="_blank">Upward  Bound awards</a> to help nearly 62,000 underserved students across the  country to be successful in high school and college. The grants fund  programs to provide tutoring, counseling, mentoring, work-study  opportunities and other activities to help students prepare for and  succeed in postsecondary education. The New England states received over  $9.6 million from the program:</p>
<p><strong>State                          Award Amount</strong></p>
<p>Connecticut                $1,126,550</p>
<p>Massachusetts           $4,015,166</p>
<p>Maine                          $1,953,560</p>
<p>New Hampshire          $899,640</p>
<p>Rhode Island                $622,001</p>
<p>Vermont                     $1,043,766</p>
<p><span style="color: #800000;"><strong>As a member of </strong><strong> </strong><strong>New England Council, </strong><strong>we publish the <em>DC Shuttle</em> each week featuring higher ed news from Washington. </strong><strong>This edition is drawn from the Council's</strong><strong><em> Weekly Washington Report</em> Higher Education Update, of May 21, 2012.</strong> <strong> </strong></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #800000;"><strong>Founded                     in    1925, the New      England Council is a    nonpartisan         alliance       of       businesses, academic   and       health    institutions,        and   public   and   private        organizations       throughout    New        England  formed to    promote     economic   growth      and a    high     quality     of     life in  the  New   England    region.    The    Council's         mission     is  to   identify   and    support       federal public     policies   and          articulate   the  voice of  its           membership   regionally and         nationally on        important     issues    facing    New     England. </strong></span><strong><span style="color: #800000;">For more information, please visit: </span><a title="www.newenglandcouncil.com" href="http://www.newenglandcouncil.com/">www.newenglandcouncil.com</a>.</strong></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nebhe.org/newslink/dc-shuttle-steming-immigration-measuring-higher-ed-productivity-funding-upward-bound/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Raising Degree Productivity by Spending Wisely</title>
		<link>http://www.nebhe.org/newslink/raising-degree-productivity-by-spending-wisely/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=raising-degree-productivity-by-spending-wisely</link>
		<comments>http://www.nebhe.org/newslink/raising-degree-productivity-by-spending-wisely/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 12:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John O. Harney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Newslink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newslink Topic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newslink Type]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college degrees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Darrell P. Aaron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Des Moines Area Community College]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Douglas Harris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[productivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sara Goldrick-Rab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Wisconsin-Madison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Upward Bound]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nebhe.org/?p=7153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>The nation is consumed by the quest to grant more college degrees. A new report by Douglas Harris and Sara Goldrick-Rab if the University of Wisconsin-Madison offers a look at how to do that cost-effectively.</p>
<p>“The (Un)Productivity of American Higher Education: From Cost Disease to Cost-Effectiveness" compares several practices to see which are cost-effective for producing ...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="pf-content"><p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p>The nation is consumed by the quest to grant more college degrees. A new <a href="http://www.lafollette.wisc.edu/publications/workingpapers/harris2010-023.pdf" target="_blank">report</a> by Douglas Harris and Sara Goldrick-Rab if the <a href="http://www.wisc.edu/" target="_blank">University of Wisconsin-Madison</a> offers a look at how to do that cost-effectively.</p>
<p>“The (Un)Productivity of American Higher Education: From Cost Disease to Cost-Effectiveness" compares several practices to see which are cost-effective for producing more degrees. The practices include programs such as GEAR UP, Upward Bound, call centers for colleges, reducing student-faculty ratios, and hiring more full-time instructors.</p>
<p>The findings support the common wisdom that outreach programs such as GEAR UP and Upward Bound are relatively expensive.</p>
<p>But they also support the notions that adding <em>full-time</em> faculty is more cost-effective than adding <em>adjuncts</em> and that running campus call-centers to contact students who miss class or fail to register can be cost-effective measures in producing more degrees. At the Des Moines Area Community College, student persistence is between 2 and 15 percentage points higher when the call center actually makes contact with the student.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nebhe.org/newslink/raising-degree-productivity-by-spending-wisely/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 10/19 queries in 0.023 seconds using disk

 Served from: www.nebhe.org @ 2013-10-17 07:18:16 by W3 Total Cache --